Paul Treble

A science graduate, Paul came to the bar via the private sector working with a number of FTSE 100 companies such as British Airways, Glaxo and Nat West.

He was called to the bar in 1994 and since then has developed an extensive practice both home and abroad. After a spell as a partner in a local firm of solicitors, he rejoined the bar and picked his practice up where he left off.

Considering his love of travel he has been fortunate to have practised both home and abroad, doing several high profile cases in common law jurisdictions; most notably a police corruption trial reaching to the highest government level.

He is efficient and personable and easy to work with, a professional but one who hasn’t forgotten that common touch. He has an eye for detail but knows what is the key issue in his case and what the tribunal wants to hear.

As an experienced and able advocate, Paul has prosecuted and defended some of the most serious cases on circuit as detailed in the Notable Cases below. A trademark of his practice though is his personal touch with his clients (or complainants, if prosecuting). He is well known for his sensitivity, communication skills and clarity with even the most difficult of clients. His policy is that it is important that the advocate doesn’t forget that one is dealing with an individual; an individual with a family and he is at pains to answers concerns and worries of those family members (with client permission).

Recently he has carved a niche in cases involving vulnerable clients and complainants and was the one of the first counsel to conduct a trial under the vulnerable witness procedure (“section 28” cases). He now regularly conducts “section 28” hearings and trials. Paul is well suited to such cases due to his understanding and experience of the needs of such individuals.

Paul also practices in the Coroners’ Court. His scientific background has helped enormously with him adapting to the inquisitorial system and in particular with the wealth of scientific evidence in such cases.

He is mindful of the ramifications of a rule 43 order and has been involved in identifying best practice and how procedures can be improved.

In a case for the family of the deceased, that passed away in the post-operative recovery room. Preparation for the inquest involved detailed analysis of the preoperative procedure and operative risk assessment. His sensitive questioning of the doctors concerned was able to give comfort to the family, who at last were able to understand the reason for their loss.

Acutely aware of the need for sensitivity in such cases whether acting for the family, individual professionals or a public body, Paul adopts an objective but compassionate, professional approach. In Paul’s experience, people, even those who have suffered unexpected bereavement or have made a fatal error, react best to an honest, realistic and sensitive advocate.

As a seasoned practitioner Paul appears often in the Court of Appeal and indeed he is particularly proud of their lordships endorsement that “Mr Treble has been a great asset to his client”.